Jesus was the original zombie

Bruce Campbell as Ash

Bruce Campbell as Ash

Easter is the day when we celebrate Jesus Christ rising from the dead. So what better way to spend the day than having a tasty brunch followed by a Zombie movie marathon?

Our Easter Sunday Zombie Movie Marathon included:28 Days Later - The first zombie movie with fast zombies. As if zombies weren’t scary enough already.

Now I’m really wanting to watch 28 Weeks Later again. The opening scene of both movies really sets the tone. Memorable and mind blowing.

***

The cult classic Army of Darkness

Sam loves these Evil Dead movies. Me, I can only take so much hokiness, but damn Bruce Campbell is a piece of boomstick carrying hotness in this film.

***

The Cutest Zombie movie you will most likely ever see is Fido 

I put off watching this on Netflix for the longest time because the write up was horrible and the pic of Fido gave me the creeps. But, I have to say I was pleasantly surprised and really did say out loud to Sam “That’s the cutest little zombie movie I ever did see”. Yes, the response to my comment was a face palm and grown.

***

Rounding out the marathon is my favorite zombie movie of all time Shaun of the Dead!!!

I can not express enough how much I love the Simon Pegg and Nick Frost marriage of comedy genius.

oo7 Skyfall (2012) review

Daniel Craig as James Bond in Skyfall*SPOILER FREE*

Skyfall is the 3rd film to star Daniel Craig in the iconic role of James Bond. How is he in the role?  I think he’s pretty good.

When Casino Royale first came out I was skeptical like many other people, but he proved himself to be capable of handling the role. I do think it’s weird how his hair color is different and he seems to have gotten a full body wax, but never the less he pulls off the character well.

He plays it very differently than previous bond actors. More serious, less cheesy. If I had to rank him among the bond actors I would say he’s #3. #1 being Sean Connery, simply because you can’t beat the original. #2 would be Pierce Brosnan. He embodies the idea of James Bond. When someone who’s not too familiar with the 007 franchise thinks of James Bond, it’s Brosnan that comes to mind.. He has had the most at bats and has the perfect suave attitude. I’ve heard that playing James Bond put him in a contract where he wasn’t allowed to wear a black suit in any other films. Daniel Craig’s biggest strength is his brutality. Out of all the Bond actors he seems the most capable of the action performed on screen. Connery has the class, Brosnan has the suave, and Craig has the brutality.

So we know now how the star ranks among the previous ones, but how does this film rank among the previous James Bond films. I actually feel that this may be the greatest James Bond film of all time. I haven’t seen every James Bond movie, but out of what I’ve seen, it’s certainly my favorite.

Skyfall takes on Sam Mendes as the new director. He does a fantastic job. He keeps the elements of the previous Craig Bond films like the brutality and realism, but adds stylistic elements from the older movies as well. A good deal of comedy is worked into the film, which I feel is a welcome addition over the sometimes overly serious tone of the past two films. This is one of the more visual appealing James Bond films. There are very interesting set designs that all look fantastic, and have wonderful cinematography. There are many references to the old James Bond films such as an old James Bond car returning, which makes this movie feel like a buffer between the old and new James Bond. Craig’s first run at James Bond was drastically different from the previous installments and left many fans a little cold.  Skyfall is a good middle ground of the two. This could have been used to ease people into the style.

Javier Bardem and Daniel Craig in SkyfallJavier Bardem plays a fantastic bad guy. The 007 franchise is known for having some of the most memorable villains of cinema history, and Javier Bardem is right up there with them. One of the best bond villains, just out of pure charisma. His most well known role before this was as Anton in No Country For Old Men. He plays a bad guy in both but the way he plays them are wildly diverse. Anton he hardly spoke. In “Skyfall” he doesn’t know when to shut up. You can tell he had a lot of fun in his role. The way he plays the character often adds a whole element to the scene he’s in. He doesn’t actually appear for a good portion of the movie, but once he does he steals the show. The actor Javier Bardem is actually afraid of guns, which is funny to think about when considering his gun heavy roles in “Skyfall” and especially “No country For Old Men” where he’s hardly ever without a gun.

The beginning part of the movie, as is now tradition, starts in the middle of an action sequence, which was great as always, and is then followed by an opening credit music sequence. I have been disappointed by a number of the intros but this one was done very well. I think they could have found a better singer than Adele but the song definitely fit the tone they were going for and she won entertainer of the year for the skyfall song. The visuals were very cool, interesting, and also quite creative.

skyfall banner“Skyfall” really explores the characters in the Bond universe. I didn’t really realize how little I actually knew about the characters before this. They explore M, and Bond especially. We get to know a little bit about Bond’s back story. His childhood, family, where he grew up, stuff like that. This is something that I never really wondered about, but never the less was interesting to learn. Sometimes there is back story that can ruin your idea of a character, and that does not happen here.

As the trailer shows, Bond has been injured and has to re-learn the ropes. His skills have fallen, and he’s no longer in active duty shape. People liked seeing the character out of his prime. I think this has been a trend lately. A character falls from his prime and has to work his way back up. That’s been a common theme in movies lately even in another blockbuster that came just before it, The Dark Knight Rises. It’s a reoccurring theme just like the “Old Guy/ action hero” movement that’s been going around lately. Started by movies like Live Free or Die Hard, “Rambo”, “RED” continuing through the Expendables 2″ and future films like “The Last Stand” and the “Bullet in the Head” remake. The weird thing is that no matter how times people see this same formula they tend to find it fresh and original.

That got really off topic, but anyway back to James Bond awesomeness. “Skyfall” is a great movie, and I think it just might be the greatest James Bond film of all time.

The Shining (1980) October horror #21

 

 

Jack Nicholson in the famous “Here’s Johnny” scene

Jack Nicholson in the famous “Here’s Johnny” scene (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

The Shining is a book and TV mini-series by Stephen King, but I’m going to talk about the 1980 film by Stanley Kubrick.

The Shining is often considered one of the greatest horror films of all time, and with good reason. Many people do not consider the Shining to be a horror film, I suppose it is more of a psychological thriller, but anything creepy can be covered on this month of reviews, and The Shining certainly fits that.

 

The Shining is a very slow movie. It’s slow in the sense that the original Halloween is slow. It takes time to set up. The whole movie is a man slowly going insane. This takes time to happen, and I actually know people who have fallen asleep during this movie, before all the creepy sh*t goes down.

If you’re someone who needs non-stop gore in your horror movie, then this may not be the perfect film for you, but I would say watch it anyway. It is a must see movie for any horror fan, or just plain film fan in general.

 

The movie starts slow and remains slow, but tightens up. The tension just builds and builds. There are lots of long shots without dialogue, and parallel to that there are some shots that are just bursting with dialogue. The scene at the bar is one of the most memorable scenes from any movie.

Jack Nicholson plays the lead, and he is freaking fantastic. It’s great to see him slowly go insane until he finally snaps. The man is a great actor and is perfect in crazy roles. I think this is probably his greatest performance, but it’s hard to pick. A lot of his dialogue, including some of his most memorable and quoted lines were improvised on the spot.

 

The main cast is rather small. the other two main characters are the wife played by Shelly Duvall, and the son played by Danny Lloyd. I find Shelly Duvall to be a little annoying. She does her job just fine, but I really think that they co

uld have found a better actress for the role. The son is good, for his age at least. He was better than most child actors. One of the most famous scenes from the movie is the “REDRUM” scene. Most people find his yelling in the scene horrifying. I just found him to be annoying.

 

Most people expect this movie to have a high body count, but there is really only one on screen death in the entire film. This is not a bad thing, in fact it is a very good thing. The movie really knows how to take it’s time a be subtle. The movie has this “Thing” about duality. Things are almost always parallel. At times you can fold the scene over and it will be a perfect match. There are pretty much two of everything. People have analyzed the hell out of this but I think it could be as simple as, Stanley Kubrick found perfect symmetry to be unnerving. Symmetry shows perfect balance, and this contrasts all the crazy stuff happening.

 

The only scene that I really have a problem with is that last scene in the maze. I find this scene to be very poorly edited. There is a chase between the father and the son. The problem is that there is no tension in this scene. It is impossible to tell how close the two people are, they never share a shot throughout the scene, and I feel that this scene lessens the impact of the end of the film.

 

And the frozen Jack Nicholson at the end always makes me laugh.

 

My noir Kubrick Kollection.

 

One of the greats, definitely check it out if you haven’t seen it, and if you have, it just might be time for a repeat viewing.

 

Tamara (2005) Macabre month of horror #6

*Spoiler Alert*

Tamara was a fairly low-budget slasher kind of horror movie.

I must begin by mentioning Jennifer’s Body“. Now I’ve never seen that movie, but from what I know about it, it looks like a giant rip off of Tamara. I have feeling Tamara wasn’t completely original either.

The basic plot is that a very “ugly” unpopular girl is tricked by some people into going to a motel room where she thinks she is going to meet her teacher for  some “cramming”. This isn’t very original, but did have a little aspect added that helped it not feeling totally cliched.

Only about half the group actually knew what was going on. She get’s embarrassed, and one thing leads to another which leads her head careening into a coffee table. Her death was a complete accident, and I thought her death was rather realistic. She doesn’t get impaled by a table or anything crazy like that, she just hits her head and dies.

The group who killed her bury her in the woods. She comes back to life because of some “Witchcraft”, and for some reason has now over gone a makeover, and acquired a new wardrobe. Taking a dirt nap is always cheaper. So now she’s transformed and wants revenge. “Jennifer’s Body” cough cough.

She doesn’t just get revenge on the people who were there when she died, there a few others as well. Some of the kills are pretty original and interesting. Two deaths that stand out are the death of her alcoholic abusive father who she forces to consume glass bear bottles until he dies, and a bulimic girl who she forces to puke until death, and this is the kind of movie that shows everything.

The kid who get’s it the worst is the one who deserved it the least. He really didn’t deserve anything. She kills him in an undeserved but interesting fashion. She forces him to kill himself over the schools TV system in a manor following the three monkeys. See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil. This scene is particularly tense and much gorier than most of the rest of the movie. I feel this kill should have gone to someone more deserving.

None of the characters are terribly interesting, but the acting is fairly solid.

Overall Tamara is a fairly solid slasher film. It doesn’t have anything too special going for it, but it has a sort of “B-movie” charm to it.

Duel (1971) Macabre month of horror #4

 

Here’s one you might not have heard of. Duel is a car chase movie, but instead of a chase it is quite literally a car “Duel”.

The main character David Mann is played by Dennis Weaver. He is driving a little car and being attacked by an unknown person in an 18 wheeler.

A tagline for the film is “The most bizarre murder weapon ever used!” This makes me think of the Tarantino film Death Proof‘. I wonder if this movie might have been his inspiration.

Perhaps the strongest point of the movie, is the tension and intrigue.

We don’t know exactly why he is being attacked, or who is even doing it. The tension keeps building and building. The tension winds up and is released in a great ending which was ripped off in “Joy Ride“.

The film is directed by Steven Spielberg and was actually made as a TV movie. Spielberg had directed many shorts and some TV episodes, but this was his first feature length endeavor.

The main character is actually very interesting. He is a deeper character than was needed, and this is certainly appreciated. There is a whole sub plot regarding the main character and his wife who is back at the home with his children.

This sub plot is unnecessary, but adds an extra level to the character. Dennis Weaver does great, really a very good performance. The character is very interesting and has a great narration throughout the film.

Of course the movie contains a great deal of driving, and this is before everything was done with CG. I always prefer real cars, and real stunts over CG.  All the car work is very well done. A classic 70′s car movie like “Gone in 60 seconds“, or “Dirty Larry Crazy Mary”.

This if more of a thriller than an action movie. As a thriller it is great. I really suggest checking it out if you are able to find it.

 

Freddy VS Jason (2003) Macabre Month of Horror #2

 

Freddy VS Jason ‘ is a great idea. Having two of the greatest horror villains of all time, fighting it out in a movie together.

This was not the first time horror icons have mixed. Characters such as Frankenstein, Dracula, and the Wolfman have all been in movies together.

Freddy vs. Jason led to many possibilities for the future. There was talk about a Freddy vs. Jason vs. Leather Face.

There were many short films continuing the fight including a 2011 short film adding Ash from “Evil Dead” into the fray.

The possibility of ‘Freddy vs. Jason’ first came from the ending of Jason goes to Hell’. At the end of the movie Jason’s mask is grabbed by the clawed glove of Freddy Krueger.  That movie came out in 1993, it took 10 years to actually get ‘Freddy vs. Jason‘ made.

Fans of the two characters either love or hate this movie. I personally love it, but I can understand why people may not. The movie is not serious at all. If you look at it as a serious film, it won’t be good. The film is very over the top and has fun with what it’s doing. I think the best horror films are the kind that have fun with it.

The battle between Freddy and Jason is exactly what I was looking for. They have a strong conflict throughout leading to a final battle that I think is perfect for what they were going for. It is very satisfying to see these two iconic characters fight it out.

There are some liberties taken with the characters. The mythology may be changed slightly, but not to the point where it is disgraceful to the franchises.

I think this is best of both franchises. It is just so much fun. But, in terms of horror, the first “Nightmare on Elm Street” wins.

 

Four Rooms Review of Rodriguez and Tarantino Sections

“Four Rooms” is an anthology of four stories each one by a different writer/director, but all starring the same main character.

Tim Roth stars as Ted the Bellhop, the character that connects the stories together. Each story takes place in a different room of the hotel that Ted works at. The time is New Year’s Eve and everybody is celebrating. Ted is practically alone at the hotel, and has to rush around to the rooms. The movie is mainly a comedy.

Robert Rodriguez does the third  section of the movie. His section is called The Misbehaviors. Antonio Banderas is in the part and he plays some kind of gangster or tough guy, it’s not very clear. He and his girlfriend, or wife (not very clear again) are bored and want to do something exciting, so Banderas takes charge. He makes Ted take care of the kids while him and the woman go out and see the fireworks, and do “other stuff”.

There are two kids, a little girl and a little boy. The boy looks like Banderas and the girl looks like the woman. This leads me to believe that the two adults both are single parents meeting up, because the kids look so different. There are little funny bits sprinkled throughout, but nothing really that funny…until the end. When you get to the end you see how the rest of the segment is all leading up to the hilarious climax. Everything just erupts at once, at the moment that Antonia Banderas walks back in.

Spoiler Alert: At the end the room is on fire, there is vomit everywhere, the paintings are ruined, there is dead hooker in the bed, and there is a giant syringe plummeting towards his child and the kid is smoking a cigarette, and more chaos. Everything comes full circle, and all the little things that seemed random before now make perfect sense. Throughout the segment they are always complaining about the smell, and think that it is someone;s feet. Turns out they were smelling a dead body rotting in the bed the whole time. Everything works out with perfect comedic timing.

The acting is good, but nothing special from the parents, and the kids, are really awkward, but I think they’re supposed to be that way. Selma Hayek is in the movie. She just plays a stripper who dances on the TV, and you never see her head.

This segment works, because of the fantastic ending.

Quentin Tarantino’s  section is called “The Man From Hollywood. Tarantino is the man and stars in this section. Bruce Willis also stars in this part, working with Tarantino again after Pulp Fiction”.

Tarantino has the ending segment, and the credits play while his part ends. This segment fits perfectly at the end. I think that this segment is the best. Best, does not mean funniest. This segment is the best speaking in terms of acting, and writing. Personally I think it is funnier throughout than any other segment, but the ending of the Rodriguez segment is arguably the funniest part of the movie.

This section can be summarized as: Ted the Bellhop goes into the penthouse suite, and is talked into refereeing a bet between Tarantino’s character and Paul Calderon’s (also from Pulp Fiction) character.

Bruce Willis‘ character spends the majority of the segment fighting with his wife over the phone. A character from the second segment , played by Jennifer Beals comes back for Tarantino’s segment, she doesn’t do too much though. Tarantino plays a big shot, Hollywood movie director who is staying at the hotel, spending New Year’s Eve partying with his friends.

The bet is over a Zippo lighter and is inspired by a 1960 Alfred Hitchcock Presents episode, “Man From the South” starring Peter Lorre and Steve McQueen.

Paul Calderon‘s character has to light his lighter 10 times in a row. If he wins he gets Tarantino’s brand new expensive car, but if he loses, his pinky finger gets cut off.

Most of the segment is Tarantino trying to convince Ted to cut off his finger if he losses the bet. Ted finally accepts. When the time comes, the comedic timing is so perfectly hilarious.

 ”Four Rooms” is a good movie. But it’s a great one if you skip the first half.  

Ong Bak Movie Review ~ by Sam

Director: Prachya Pinkaew

Starring

Ting: Tony Jaa

The title “Ong-Bak” is referring to a stone Buddha head, which is what gives the main character a reason to go on a path of destruction. Someone steals Ong Bak and Tony Jaa, the main actor, needs to retrieve it before the yearly festival or else the village will be cursed. He doesn’t actually want to fight when he has the chance because it is seen as immoral in his village.

The full title is Ong Bak: The Thai warrior the movie as you can probably guess, is Thai made. Supposedly Taiwanese movies have a very particular style of direction and comedy, that can be found here, I guess.

Besides the quest to retrieve the Ong Bak the plot also contains a sub plot of a man who was originally from the village who over a complete story arch re-discovers his pride for his heritage. The main plot really just serves as a way to move from fight to fight and from chase to chase.

Ting (Tony Jaa) is ready for another showdown.The action is handled extremely well. there is a genuine fight club in the movie which serves little other purpose than to add a few extra fights to the movie. The fight club is a location that is visited a few times, and like many great movies when you are done with a location destroy it. The final fight consists of the main character taking down three increasingly difficult enemies and the last completely destroys the entire club. Now that I think about it all of the locations are destroyed after using them, for the most part.

The Writer director also has a co star role and he also serves as the comedic relief. The director really showcases the action and the awesomeness of the protagonist. There is a chase through back alleys that represents this fact. The chase is hilarious as well as awesome, and really shows off the physical prowess and amazing jumping capabilities of the protagonist. I love how the director does the action. There is a little difference that makes a big difference; something amazing will happen, something so cool that you want to rewind it and watch it again and the movie beats me to it with instant replay’s from different angles and slow-motion, sometimes they show the same shot up to 6 times, the movie knows when something is so cool that you want to see it again.

This movie was great, low on plot content, but it was designed to be that. This a great martial arts action movie, that could have started a great fhttp://greencarbon2112.wordpress.com/wp-admin/post-new.phpranchise. They attempted the franchise but it didn’t do so well. I have not yet seen the 3rd one and I’m not sure that I want to, seeing as the second one was so awful. 

Maximum Overdrive Movie Review ~ By Sam

Maximum Overdrive is based off the Stephen King short story Trucks. I wonder why this is the movie he was most involved with out of all the others. Stephen King cameo is as a guy who gets insulted by an ATM. This is the only movie which Stephen King actually directed. This also happens to be my favorite movie based on a Stephen King book.

“Maximum Overdrive” is about trucks that  come to life and start killing people. But its not just trucks, it’s everything electrical. It might sound stupid, but that’s because it is stupid, and it knows its stupid. The movie goes really over the top and has fun in doing so, and I enjoy that. There are other movies like that such as the two “Crank” movies. I really like that style.


AC/DC exclusively does the music for this movie. Their album Who Made Who is the “Maximum Overdrive” sound track. In the opening a bridge opens on its own causing cars on the bridge to be destroyed. On the bridge is the AC/DC van.

Emilio Estevez stars in this movie. His character is very
forgettable, but the people aren’t really why you watch the movie. Other memorable supporting cast members are, are an extremely annoying waitress who does nothing but scream, and a very weird couple who just got married.

Most of the movie takes place at a rest stop gas station, but
there are others areas as well, like the baseball field, which has my two favorite parts.

First is when a soda machine starts killing a baseball team with cans, and the second is when a steamroller rides onto the field. A kid gets run over by the steamroller, it is rumored that there was some kind of head explosion effect, but it had to be removed, because of censorship issues.

There is a reason for all the electrical things coming to life, but it doesn’t make any sense. Mostly because there are two completely different explanations, and both of them are stupid. One explanation involves a meteorite passing over the earth, and the other has almost no relation to it. Each reason is not really explained; they just show up in text, one in the beginning and one at the end.

The truck stop is named “The Dixie Boy Truck Stop”. The truck stop was real and remained open for a while after the movie. Someone bought it and eventually got rid of the truck stop.

Definitely not a movie everyone will like, but I enjoyed it for what it is: stupid and fun as hell, with trucks, guns, and AC/DC.

Dead Alive Review ~ by Sam


Dead Alive (Brain Dead)

Dead Alive was directed by Peter Jackson most famous for the Lord Of The Rings Trilogy.  But Dead Alive was before all that. If you ask me Dead Alive is 20x better but that is only true if you are a real gore hound.

Dead Alive has a reputation as being the goriest movie ever made. When I heard that I was really skeptical. I was shown though. Dead alive truly is the goriest movie ever made.

It’s not bad gore either, all the effects are really good. Gallons and gallons of blood are splashed all over the place, body parts being cut off all look painfully real, and all other effects look amazing.

There is even use of Claymation for the cause of the problem. You really need to see it to believe it. There is some real nauseating stuff, but that doesn’t faze me. Hell, after the movie I wanted to go get some bacon.

The movie just throws being serious out the window, and makes no attempt to be genuinely freaky or serious. For how much bloodshed and gore there is, the movie is hilarious. Great scenes like the priest and baby at the park are just amazingly twisted and funny. Things like this almost start to overstay their welcome, almost. That would be my only problem, some bits don’t know when to quit but they remain funny throughout so its no problem.

Many horror movies have shallow characters but not Dead Alive. Every character has a unique and funny personality which the first half of the movie spends building up. The writing and directing are both extremely well done. I am a little bit surprised I haven’t seen any of the actors in other films. Probably because the movie was made in New Zealand.

Only in America is Dead Alive called dead Alive, everywhere else it’s known as Brain Dead. Why change it? I’m not sure, but both are good titles. I prefer Dead Alive because it perfectly represents the zombie like monsters.

Dead Alive is a movie that I saw for the first time in part of the Friday night “Extreme Series” at Red River Theatres in Concord, NH. I am very glad I waited until it was in the theater because that is where it should be experienced. At least with a large group of people and a big screen. Everybody in the audience will cheer clap and laugh and in some cases puke at the sight of the masterpiece of horror that is Dead Alive.