Jesus was the original zombie

Bruce Campbell as Ash

Bruce Campbell as Ash

Easter is the day when we celebrate Jesus Christ rising from the dead. So what better way to spend the day than having a tasty brunch followed by a Zombie movie marathon?

Our Easter Sunday Zombie Movie Marathon included:28 Days Later - The first zombie movie with fast zombies. As if zombies weren’t scary enough already.

Now I’m really wanting to watch 28 Weeks Later again. The opening scene of both movies really sets the tone. Memorable and mind blowing.

***

The cult classic Army of Darkness

Sam loves these Evil Dead movies. Me, I can only take so much hokiness, but damn Bruce Campbell is a piece of boomstick carrying hotness in this film.

***

The Cutest Zombie movie you will most likely ever see is Fido 

I put off watching this on Netflix for the longest time because the write up was horrible and the pic of Fido gave me the creeps. But, I have to say I was pleasantly surprised and really did say out loud to Sam “That’s the cutest little zombie movie I ever did see”. Yes, the response to my comment was a face palm and grown.

***

Rounding out the marathon is my favorite zombie movie of all time Shaun of the Dead!!!

I can not express enough how much I love the Simon Pegg and Nick Frost marriage of comedy genius.

Community Movie Night

Sam and his friend Shaun started the Newfound Film Making Club  (NFMC) in the spring of 2012 with me, Amy Lyn, as the adviser. The group has grown in size over this past year and has done a lot of fun projects together.

In October we hosted a triple feature horror movie night at the high school.  A scary good time was had by all but due to licensing restrictions, only students from the high school were allowed to attend. So we are branching out. In conjunction with the Gordon-Nash Library in New Hampton, NH we are hosting our first Community Movie Night on Tuesday February 19. The event will start at 4pm with some movie trivia, a short film created by the NFMC and then on to the main feature the ‘Blues Brothers‘. Refreshments will be available and all are welcome.

Community Movie Night Blues Brothers

Zone Indefinitely

Here is a brief look at one of the movies Sam is currently working on.

He wrote the script for a class inspired by the book “The Last Babylon”. It’s pretty dark and twisted. Unfortunately, because of conflicts between cast members, shooting has been delayed.

Sam edited a brief snap shot for you to take a look at. Hopefully, if enough people view, comment and like the clip the actors will get back to work.

oo7 Skyfall (2012) review

Daniel Craig as James Bond in Skyfall*SPOILER FREE*

Skyfall is the 3rd film to star Daniel Craig in the iconic role of James Bond. How is he in the role?  I think he’s pretty good.

When Casino Royale first came out I was skeptical like many other people, but he proved himself to be capable of handling the role. I do think it’s weird how his hair color is different and he seems to have gotten a full body wax, but never the less he pulls off the character well.

He plays it very differently than previous bond actors. More serious, less cheesy. If I had to rank him among the bond actors I would say he’s #3. #1 being Sean Connery, simply because you can’t beat the original. #2 would be Pierce Brosnan. He embodies the idea of James Bond. When someone who’s not too familiar with the 007 franchise thinks of James Bond, it’s Brosnan that comes to mind.. He has had the most at bats and has the perfect suave attitude. I’ve heard that playing James Bond put him in a contract where he wasn’t allowed to wear a black suit in any other films. Daniel Craig’s biggest strength is his brutality. Out of all the Bond actors he seems the most capable of the action performed on screen. Connery has the class, Brosnan has the suave, and Craig has the brutality.

So we know now how the star ranks among the previous ones, but how does this film rank among the previous James Bond films. I actually feel that this may be the greatest James Bond film of all time. I haven’t seen every James Bond movie, but out of what I’ve seen, it’s certainly my favorite.

Skyfall takes on Sam Mendes as the new director. He does a fantastic job. He keeps the elements of the previous Craig Bond films like the brutality and realism, but adds stylistic elements from the older movies as well. A good deal of comedy is worked into the film, which I feel is a welcome addition over the sometimes overly serious tone of the past two films. This is one of the more visual appealing James Bond films. There are very interesting set designs that all look fantastic, and have wonderful cinematography. There are many references to the old James Bond films such as an old James Bond car returning, which makes this movie feel like a buffer between the old and new James Bond. Craig’s first run at James Bond was drastically different from the previous installments and left many fans a little cold.  Skyfall is a good middle ground of the two. This could have been used to ease people into the style.

Javier Bardem and Daniel Craig in SkyfallJavier Bardem plays a fantastic bad guy. The 007 franchise is known for having some of the most memorable villains of cinema history, and Javier Bardem is right up there with them. One of the best bond villains, just out of pure charisma. His most well known role before this was as Anton in No Country For Old Men. He plays a bad guy in both but the way he plays them are wildly diverse. Anton he hardly spoke. In “Skyfall” he doesn’t know when to shut up. You can tell he had a lot of fun in his role. The way he plays the character often adds a whole element to the scene he’s in. He doesn’t actually appear for a good portion of the movie, but once he does he steals the show. The actor Javier Bardem is actually afraid of guns, which is funny to think about when considering his gun heavy roles in “Skyfall” and especially “No country For Old Men” where he’s hardly ever without a gun.

The beginning part of the movie, as is now tradition, starts in the middle of an action sequence, which was great as always, and is then followed by an opening credit music sequence. I have been disappointed by a number of the intros but this one was done very well. I think they could have found a better singer than Adele but the song definitely fit the tone they were going for and she won entertainer of the year for the skyfall song. The visuals were very cool, interesting, and also quite creative.

skyfall banner“Skyfall” really explores the characters in the Bond universe. I didn’t really realize how little I actually knew about the characters before this. They explore M, and Bond especially. We get to know a little bit about Bond’s back story. His childhood, family, where he grew up, stuff like that. This is something that I never really wondered about, but never the less was interesting to learn. Sometimes there is back story that can ruin your idea of a character, and that does not happen here.

As the trailer shows, Bond has been injured and has to re-learn the ropes. His skills have fallen, and he’s no longer in active duty shape. People liked seeing the character out of his prime. I think this has been a trend lately. A character falls from his prime and has to work his way back up. That’s been a common theme in movies lately even in another blockbuster that came just before it, The Dark Knight Rises. It’s a reoccurring theme just like the “Old Guy/ action hero” movement that’s been going around lately. Started by movies like Live Free or Die Hard, “Rambo”, “RED” continuing through the Expendables 2″ and future films like “The Last Stand” and the “Bullet in the Head” remake. The weird thing is that no matter how times people see this same formula they tend to find it fresh and original.

That got really off topic, but anyway back to James Bond awesomeness. “Skyfall” is a great movie, and I think it just might be the greatest James Bond film of all time.

The Number 23 (2007) Macabre month of horror #23

Cover of "The Number 23 (Unrated Infinifi...

Cover via Amazon

 

The Number 23 is Jim Carrey trying to be serious. I actually think that Jim Carrey does a pretty good job. At least in one of his roles.

 

The plot seems simple. A man becomes obsessed over the number 23. In actuality it’s deeper than that. But honestly, I’d prefer if it wasn’t. The other plot is about the character as some detective, and has this death obsessed girlfriend. I found this part of the movie to be absolutely dreadful. The movie would be much shorter and much more enjoyable if it stayed away from the side story.

 

The main story I found to be … okay. Jim Carrey’s performance was good, but nothing special. He really got over inflated over the role though, he started trying to do all serious film, and damn near killed his career. He’s still trying to recover.

 

The movie prides itself on being a smart mystery with a great plot twist. None of those things are true. It is true that the movie has a plot twist, but I don’t there is anyone who didn’t see it coming. The movie ends with plot holes. I mean a lot of plot holes. I mean a lot of plot holes! There are soooooo many things that don’t add up or make sense. Not because the movie is mysterious, but just because there is a genuine lapse of time in the life of this character, that doesn’t make any sense.

 

The atmosphere and lighting can be very good at points, but can also be terrible. The movie goes overboard on darkness, quite a bit.

 

The character is always finding the number 23 all over the place. Some of the way’s he finds it can be really convoluted and are just plain stupid.

 

The movie is definitely bad, but the movie is often proclaimed as one of the worst ever made. I do not think that is true. It’s not good, but I found it to be entertaining enough. It’s not nearly as bad as a lot of people say but still nothing too good.

 

And now I leave you with 10 instances of ridiculous ways to find “The Number 23

1. At the Bakery

 

  • A house if 5 blocks away from a bakery that charges $6 for 3 muffins.
  • The muffins are bran which has 4 letters
  • The word four itself has 4 letters.
  • 5 + 6 + 3 + 4 + 4 = 22 and all this goes into 1 sentence making 23

 

2. In a name

  • The name Jim Carrey has 9 letters but the J and the C are capitalized so they count as 2 letter each
  • C is the 3rd letter of the alphabet and J is the 10th
  • 9 + 2 + 3 + 10 = 24
  • The movies run time is 1 minute over 100 minutes
  • 24 – 1 = 23.

 

3. In the movie ratings

  • This movie has an 8 on rotten tomatoes
  • It’s rated 6 on imdb that’s 14
  • 14 + 10 – 1 = 23 (I assure you they are really this bad)

 

4. 23 is a number

 

5. In the spelling

  • When you spell out “twenty three” you get 11 letters
  • 23 ends with 3
  • 11 * 3 = 33
  • 23 starts with a 2 in the tens position meaning 20. in the 33 the tens position contains a 3 meaning 30. We change the 3 to a two from 23 and end with 23.

 

6. In a date

  • Jim Carrey was 45 when the movie came out in 2007
  • His first television appearance was at the age of 18 in 1980
  • 45 – 18 = 27
  • The number of years between 1980 and 2007 is 27
  • Jim Carrey has won 40 awards and been nominated for another 67
  • 67 – 40 = 27
  • Maybe they should make a sequel called the number 27 where Jim Carrey just Google’s himself for an hour and a half.

 

7. In simple addition

  • This is number 7 on the list
  • 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 = 28 – 7 = 21
  • There are 2 more numbers before the final one
  • 21 + 2 = 23.

 

8. In movie titles

  • “Friday the 13th” + “se7en” + “9″ + “The 6th Day” = “The number 23″

 

9. On my blog

  • This is review #23 for my month of horror reviews
  • Jim Carrey has done 23 interviews, 29 articles and 33 magazines. and 2 biographies
  • There are two 2′s and two 3′s 23.

 

10. Everywhere you look

  • Jim Carrey has 50 titles on his filmography + 8 writing credits + 12 soundtrack credits + 3 producer credits + 1 crew credit + 3  thanks + 47 archive footage credits – 155 self credits = -31
  • The opposite of -31 is 13
  • His height is 6’1 which is 1.87 meters
  • Take away the decimals and you’re left with 6 and 1 which = 7
  • 13 + 7 = 20
  • He is a Capricorn which is associated with the letter E and is directly across on the star chart from Cancer which is associated with the letter W
  • The symbol for Cancer is a 69
  • E and W are two of the four cardinal directions
  • The four cardinal directions are E,W,S,N, which is an anagram for the word news
  • News was invented in 59 B.C.
  • 69 – 59 is 10
  • There are 12 symbols on the star sign chart 12 – 10 = 2
  • This is the last on the list. The last could be thought of as ten or as 1 if you look at it in reverse chronological order. 2 + 1 + 20 = 23

 

 

The Faculty (1998) October horror #19

Cover of "The Faculty"

The Faculty is the kind of movie that is easily miss-able, and easily forgettable. It has definitely faded into obscurity, but I doubt it was even widely known when it first came out. I only saw it because it was directed by Robert Rodriguez.

This may be sounding like you shouldn’t see it, but quite the contrary. I found this to be a very fun horror movie. It’s not scary, or very original, but it is gory, and fun. And, it has some pretty good music.

The movie is full of well known actors which was a surprise to me. It stars Elijah Wood who is great. It also features Salma Hayek (It’s a Rodriguez film, of course she’s in it), Robert Patrick of Terminator 2 fame, and even Jon Stewart. None of these stars felt forced into the movie. It was fun to find them in a movie like this. There is also Usher, Danny Masterson (from That 70′s Show), Daniel Von Bargen (Who I’ll always remember as Comandant Spangler), and the guy that I can only remember as Shooter Mcgavin (Christopher Mcdonald).

The Faculty has some really great gore effects. There are a lot of practical effects which all look amazing, but there is also some CG effects which look awful. The good gore outweighs the bad gore.

The Faculty has an interesting enough premise, good directing, solid acting, and just enough stupid to make for a very fun time.

Friday the 13th (1980) Macabre month of horror #13

“Friday the 13th” is one of the most well known slasher films. There have been a ridiculous amount of sequels, a crossover, and of course a remake. This is a huge franchise. So how does the first film fair?

Cover of "Friday the 13th"

The icon of the series is the hokey masked slasher Jason Voorhees. However Jason is not the killer in the first film. He is in fact in the movie, but only briefly as a child. He isn’t the killer until the second movie, and he doesn’t wear the iconic hokey mask, until the the third movie. Jason’s mother is the killer in the first movie, and is played by Betsy Palmer, which came as a surprise to a lot of people.

The first two in the series are very effective, but after that they are bad but usually in an enjoyable way.

Tom Savini applies make-up to Ari Lehman, crea...

The movie has a pretty good cast. Some of the characters are quite annoying, one is really funny, and one becomes the big star, Kevin Bacon.

Tom Savini did the special effects and they look great. He is awesome in everything he works on.He

acts and does special effects and makeup for many horror movies including Dawn of the Dead, From Dusk Till Dawn, and Creep Show. Some special effect highlights are the arrow through the neck, and the design for young Jason.

Friday the 13th is one of the greats. It’s old but holds up pretty well. Don’t watch the remake or sequels without seeing the original.

Alien (1979) Macabre month of horror #11

Cover of "Alien (The Director's Cut)"

Cover of Alien (The Director’s Cut)

*Spoiler Alert* I know it’s an old movie, but there are still many people who have not seen it.

Ridley Scott is a great director. He has many amazing film including “Gladiator“, “Black Hawk Down“, “Blade Runner“, and of course “Alien” which was only his second feature film.

The famous tagline for this movie was “In space no one can here you scream.”  This is a good tagline as well as a good solution to the horror isolation element. In horror movies there needs to be a reason why the protagonist can’t simply go to the police, or get help. In space there is no help.

The alien is one of the greatest horror character designs of all time. It looks completely original, like no alien before it’s time. The Alien was designed off of the art work of H. R. Geiger. Geiger does some cool stuff, and his designs have been used in other movies and games. The art design for the entire movie looks fantastic. From huge, very detailed sets, to the special effects, and eggs, the movie looks great and still holds up today. I’ll take practical effects over CG any day.

The cast is great. Sigourney Weaver is the main protagonist “Ripley” and this is the film that made her an icon. She has made many other films, and constantly returns to sci-fi films for cameos.

The rest of the cast is great as well. A lot of horror movies suffer from characters that you simply don’t care about, they just add to the body count, but these characters have depth, and even sub-plots aside from the main plot.

Giger's Alien, as portrayed by Bolaji Badejo i...

Giger’s Alien, as portrayed by Bolaji Badejo in Ridley Scott’s 1979 film Alien (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

One of the characters who you went through the movie with, turns out to be an android. The android attacks Ripley and this causes a fear of robots in the sequels.

“Aliens” is claimed as one of the greatest sequels of all time, often claiming it’s better than the original. This time James Cameron takes over the director chair and we have a genre switch. The first “Alien” was a sci-fi horror film, while the second is more of a sci-fi action film. James Cameron knows how to make a sequel. The relationship is very similar between the Alien films and the Terminator films. James Cameron also directed the Terminator series, and the first one is more of a sci-fi horror/thriller (almost slasher even) and the second is more of a sci-fi action movie. The third in both series’ is complete crap.

The movie “Alien” is a classic. It has some of the most memorable and often referenced scenes. Perhaps most famous is the chest buster scene (Which it’s always called but if I remember correctly, it busts out of the stomach.) This scene is so instantly recognizable. Many people found it horrifying. I found it hilarious. Not the bursting itself, but rather the way the little alien slides across the table after. I guess most people are a little too freaked out to notice it.

Psycho (1960) Macabre month of horror #9

 

*Spoiler Alert *

 

(I know this is a very old film but there are still some people who have not seen it yet.)

 

Cover of "Psycho (Collector's Edition)"

Cover of Psycho (Collector’s Edition)

 

Today I’m talking about the black and white masterpiece by Alfred Hitchcock.

 

If you don’t know who Hitchcock is then you’re missing out on some of the greatest films ever made. The sheer volume of his output is amazing. He has made classics like North by Northwest“, “Rear Window, and of course Psycho“.

 

Psycho was instantly hailed as a masterpiece as soon as it hit theaters. Once the movie started the theater doors would be locked.Hitchcock wouldn’t have anybody missing even a second of the film. Psycho worked so well when it first came out because nobody knew what it was about. People back then didn’t know that it was a horror movie.

 

The film was said to star Janet Leigh. Which it did, but only in the beginning. The film starts out as a crime thriller, where a woman has stolen a bunch of money and is now on the run. She stops at a motel for the night, and this is where the audience was completely shocked. Janet Leigh’s character is stabbed to death in the shower.

 

Today the movie holds up just fine but there is  an element of surprise missing. That scene as well as the rest of the movie is so well known that people usually know what happens. Imagine you saw the film in the theater when it first came out. You’re watching a crime thriller, then all of a sudden the main character dies and the film switches genre. The movie is still a masterpiece but now is a lot less shocking.   That say’s a lot about a movie like this. When a viewer knows what is going to happen, but the film remains tense and wildly interesting, that is a great directing feat.

 

Anthony Perkins as Norman Bates is one of the all time greatest performances. Sadly this role negatively affected his career. People had a hard time seeing him as something other than a crazy person. Much like Mark Hamill after Star Wars, he had a hard time getting good roles. Anthony Perkins actually underwent psycho analysis from the 50′s to the 70′s. He was really interested in that kind of thing so of course the role appealed to him.

 

Hitchcock makes a cameo as always, as a man who misses a bus in the very beginning of the film.

 

The character of Norman Bates was based off of the serial Ed Gein. The same guy that inspired “Texas Chainsaw Massacre” and “Silence of the Lambs”.

 

Hitchcock isn’t called the master of suspense for nothing. Psycho is a fantastic film that I believe is his finest work.

 

 

After Hitchcock’s death, they started making sequels to psycho. These sequels are a disgrace, and should not have been made. Even worse than the sequels is the remake.

 

 

Drive Thru (2007) Macabre month of horror #7

Let me start out by saying that ‘Drive Thru‘ is definitely not a good movie, but it is soooooo much fun. Get a few friends together and watch Drive Thru, you’re sure to have a good time ripping into it.

Drive Thru is about Horny the clown, who is the mascot for a fictional fast food place named Hella‘ Burger”. None of the human characters are any good, this is really a slasher film where you root for the villain. Horny the clown is awesome and you are definitely on his side.

The main girl, who you are supposed to rooting, for is actually kind of a bitch. Pretty much all of the human characters are. Their “Big Star” is Larry Joe Campbell, and he is extremely annoying in this role.

This is a real fault, because a staple of slasher films is to have at least one decent character who you want to win over the slasher, but in this film you’re just like “Go ahead kill her, I don’t care.”

The movie flip flops between whether it is supernatural or grounded in reality. Almost like they couldn’t decide. There are moments when Horny does things that are completely impossible, then the movie tells you he is just a normal guy. Horny does have a motive for doing all the killing, but it’s kind of convoluted and doesn’t really make sense. Then they change their mind again and tell you that there is something supernatural going on. After that the movie tries to drop a series of plot twists, all of which are underwhelming, unnecessary, and very stupid.

Some of the gore effects are just laughably bad. They actual have a really bad Tom and Jerry kill, where Horny cuts a dude into about 8 pieces and he falls apart with horrible computer effects. It’s so bad and it’s actually really unintentionally funny. There are problems like this all throughout the movie, not contained strictly to the gore.

There is a very off putting and unneeded use of fortune telling toys. They use a Ouija board, which is just to say “Hey we have a Ouija board in our movie”. They even use a magic eight ball. Later on they try to play it off as some sort of revelation or plot twist, but nobody’s buying that.

An interesting note: The guy who played the manager at the restaurant is the “Super Size Me” guy.

The movie is really bad, but in a good way. It really is such a good time. It is actually my favorite on the DVD collection. I recommend checking it out with a friend.